[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Travelling Salesman Problem
There are MUCH better systems than Evolver.
Both ICGA 1997 and PPSN 1998 had papers on systems
that solved upto 3000 cities to optimality.
Darrell Whitley
|-----------------------------------------------------------------| o__
| Darrell Whitley EMAIL: whitley@cs.colostate.edu | .>/ _
| Computer Science PHONE: (970) 491-5373 |(*),\(*)
| Colorado State University FAX: (970) 491-2466 |
| Fort Collins, CO 80523 http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~whitley | 99:3,850
|-----------------------------------------------------------------| 98:3,506
| *** GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE *** | 97:3,355
| ** GECCO-2000 ** Las Vegas, Nevada USA, July 8-12, 2000 | 96:3,215
| Chair: Darrell Whitley; Submission deadline: January 26, 2000 | 95:3,030
| WEB: www.genetic-programming.org or www.genetic-algorithm.org | 94:3,145
|-----------------------------------------------------------------| Miles
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, David Bosomworth wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm conducting some research into using Genetic Algorithms in a problem
> identical to the Travelling salesman problem and came across this list
> with interest.
>
> I've conducted some trials using a genetic algorithm software package
> called 'Evolver'. The trials were based around varying the number of
> destinations and measuring the performance of the software as the number
> of destinations (and hence obviously permutations) increases.
>
> The number of destinations used were 25,50,75,100,133. We found that
> Evolver performed worse than human performance above 25 destinations.
>
> I was wondering if anyone had come across any similar research into the
> TSP and in particular I'm trying to determine:
>
> * Is there a maximum threshold number of destinations that can be
> handled by genetic algorithms in the TSP example?
>
> * Are there any better (& more powerful) genetic algorithm
> software packages than 'Evolver' available?
>
> Also rather surprisingly, plotting the total time taken to go round all
> the destinations against number of destinations gave a pretty straight
> line - (I would have expected a genetic algorithm to give a more random
> result).
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> David Bosomworth
>
>
>